<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Flood maps.</title> <atom:link href="http://dylan.tweney.com/2006/12/06/flood-maps/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://dylan.tweney.com/2006/12/06/flood-maps/</link> <description>if you&#039;re bored, you&#039;re not paying attention</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 12:41:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Dylan</title><link>http://dylan.tweney.com/2006/12/06/flood-maps/comment-page-1/#comment-2759</link> <dc:creator>Dylan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 22:52:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://dylan.tweney.com/2006/12/06/flood-maps/#comment-2759</guid> <description>Alex! Thanks for the flood maps. And thanks for the quick correction.I have no basis for assuming that U. of Arizona&#039;s maps are more accurate, though that app seems to be built on standard GIS datasets instead of Google Maps and the NASA survey. Does it mean its more accurate because it&#039;s been built by geoscience guys? Perhaps. Perhaps not. For my part of the world its scenarios track pretty closely with yours -- and that&#039;s as far as my analysis can go.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex! Thanks for the flood maps. And thanks for the quick correction.</p><p>I have no basis for assuming that U. of Arizona&#8217;s maps are more accurate, though that app seems to be built on standard GIS datasets instead of Google Maps and the NASA survey. Does it mean its more accurate because it&#8217;s been built by geoscience guys? Perhaps. Perhaps not. For my part of the world its scenarios track pretty closely with yours &#8212; and that&#8217;s as far as my analysis can go.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Alex Tingle</title><link>http://dylan.tweney.com/2006/12/06/flood-maps/comment-page-1/#comment-2758</link> <dc:creator>Alex Tingle</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 22:44:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://dylan.tweney.com/2006/12/06/flood-maps/#comment-2758</guid> <description>Hi, I&#039;m the flood maps developer. Thanks for blogging me. May I just clear up a couple of inaccuracies?Firstly &#039;Flood Maps&#039; covers 1-14m of sea level rise, not 1-7m.Secondly, I don&#039;t think the University of Arizona maps are much more reliable than mine. They don&#039;t take tides or coastal defenses into account either: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.geo.arizona.edu/dgesl/research/other/climate_change_and_sea_level/sea_level_rise/sea_level_rise_technical.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Here are their techincal details&lt;/a&gt;.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, I&#8217;m the flood maps developer. Thanks for blogging me. May I just clear up a couple of inaccuracies?</p><p>Firstly &#8216;Flood Maps&#8217; covers 1-14m of sea level rise, not 1-7m.</p><p>Secondly, I don&#8217;t think the University of Arizona maps are much more reliable than mine. They don&#8217;t take tides or coastal defenses into account either: <a
href="http://www.geo.arizona.edu/dgesl/research/other/climate_change_and_sea_level/sea_level_rise/sea_level_rise_technical.htm">Here are their techincal details</a>.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/10 queries in 0.019 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: dylan.tweney.com @ 2012-02-07 02:45:21 -->
