<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Why net neutrality is like a ton of bricks.</title> <atom:link href="http://dylan.tweney.com/2006/06/26/why-net-neutrality-is-like-a-ton-of-bricks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://dylan.tweney.com/2006/06/26/why-net-neutrality-is-like-a-ton-of-bricks/</link> <description>if you&#039;re bored, you&#039;re not paying attention</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 12:41:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Seth H</title><link>http://dylan.tweney.com/2006/06/26/why-net-neutrality-is-like-a-ton-of-bricks/comment-page-1/#comment-2006</link> <dc:creator>Seth H</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2006 17:23:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://dylan.tweney.com/2006/06/26/why-net-neutrality-is-like-a-ton-of-bricks/#comment-2006</guid> <description>&quot;Particularly if those schemes will make it difficult for us to view, read, or listen to certain kinds of stuff.&quot;When a political newsletter I subscribe to asked me to &#039;sign&#039; an online petition against Net-Neutrality - I did, for many of the reasons you specified. It&#039;s a free-market, charge what you want to - but you don&#039;t need to write a new law for it.What does worry me is another interpretation of the term &quot;net-neutrality&quot;. I too, worry that if I happen to use Skype, and not the VoIP that my ISP provides - will the ISP block traffic and so by force me to use thier product?It makes me really angry when I consider that copper and coax were wired to homes using public right-of-way and taxdollars and tax breaks.I think this is a temporary issue. Consolidation of content outlets and titles should occur as more and more services like iPod become the de facto &#039;method&#039; of distribution. The companies actually in possession of the product(s) (content &amp; pathway) will negotiate terms to ensure delivery.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Particularly if those schemes will make it difficult for us to view, read, or listen to certain kinds of stuff.&#8221;</p><p>When a political newsletter I subscribe to asked me to &#8216;sign&#8217; an online petition against Net-Neutrality &#8211; I did, for many of the reasons you specified. It&#8217;s a free-market, charge what you want to &#8211; but you don&#8217;t need to write a new law for it.</p><p>What does worry me is another interpretation of the term &#8220;net-neutrality&#8221;. I too, worry that if I happen to use Skype, and not the VoIP that my ISP provides &#8211; will the ISP block traffic and so by force me to use thier product?</p><p>It makes me really angry when I consider that copper and coax were wired to homes using public right-of-way and taxdollars and tax breaks.</p><p>I think this is a temporary issue. Consolidation of content outlets and titles should occur as more and more services like iPod become the de facto &#8216;method&#8217; of distribution. The companies actually in possession of the product(s) (content &amp; pathway) will negotiate terms to ensure delivery.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/9 queries in 0.008 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: dylan.tweney.com @ 2012-02-09 01:37:00 -->
